SourceGear Support

Please do!

I found that when I do set a working folder that it does appear faster on subsequent GETVERSIONs (20 seconds instead of 2+ minutes for 16,000 files)

My CI server users the same folder for the build of a project over and over. As such, when changes are detected in Vault (by examining VERSIONHISTORY -rowlimit 1), I'd like to just get the changes into that same folder. However, to make sure I know which version I'm building, I don't use GET to get ...

It's been a couple of years. Has this bug been fixed yet? To be clear, in our CI environment, getting the latest to perform a build does NOT delete files from the working folder that have been deleted in the repository. This means the build is potentially including files that should no longer be the...

That's great, James!

FWIW, I built an in-house plugin for Vault and Jenkins. It supports polling and triggering. Behind the scenes, it's using the Vault command line, though I would've much preferred to use the Java class library. My version doesn't support slaves at all.

We found after upgrade to Vault 6.0 the Visual Studio 2010 is very slow, esp when we save the change of the file ... We are using Vault 6.0/ Visual Studio 2010/ Resharper 7 and Windows 7 Wow! I just upgraded to Vault 6.0 (from 5.0) on Monday and my Visual Studio 2010 (on Windows 7, also with ReShar...

This is an .msi error. Users sometimes get this error when the installer has trouble with registry entries from a previous installation. Is this a fresh install on a new machine? An upgrade of an existing version of Vault? If so, which version? Well, we had Vault 5.x installed on another box and in...

What causes this? I'm on Windows Server 2008 R2 64-bit running the VaultServer64_6_0_1_598.msi. Error 1721. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support personnel or package vendor. Action: CustomAction...

FWIW, "iisreset" worked. We were able to rename the user. And since you asked for it, here's our client/server info: Client Information Vault Standard Client Version: 5.1.2.19281 .NET Framework Version: 2.0.50727.5448 Operating System: Microsoft Windows 7 Professional Service Pack: 1.0 OS ...

I tried that, with my colleague rkamath, but it didn't work.

Beth wrote:Is that user using Active Directory authentication? If so, then switch the user to Vault authentication first, and save that change. Then try renaming the user.

When I attempt to rename one particular user, it doesn't work. In fact, no error appears, but I remain on the edit screen. Using Fiddler2, I can see the HTTP response being an HTML response stating "Error in the application". Looking in the log, I see a violation of the "fk_loginattem...

I can put in a feature request for different functionality if you would like. Beth, yes. I think I could summarize the two, possibly mutually exclusive, features like this: Use a single, atomic commit for moves, shares, renames and file changes (not a two-step commit) Offer a "dry run" pr...

Atomic Commit: Vault does have the ability to perform an atomic commit, even on the results of a merge branches. Beth, the Vault Standard Client Help's Merge Branches topic states for both "moves and shares" and "renames": The [move/rename] operations will be performed and commi...

Unfortunately, we don't currently have a way to run the merge branches via command line. It's an entire wizard with multiple steps to it. Pardon me interrupting the thread, but this thread touched on the every thing I'm struggling with. Difficulty in merging. Is it really NOT possible to do a "...

Was this ever fixed?