Search found 146 matches

by Thomas Linder Puls
Thu Sep 10, 2015 8:19 am
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Windows 10
Replies: 15
Views: 30583

Re: Windows 10

One of our user have received a Windows 10 machine (the rest of us have not shifted to Windows 10). On that machine our largest repository cannot load in the GUI client at all (we have waited several hours). (Running a virtual Windows XP machine on that Windows 10 computer there was no problems, so ...
by Thomas Linder Puls
Fri Apr 24, 2015 3:32 am
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Undo check-out does not set current file time
Replies: 10
Views: 14520

Re: Undo check-out does not set current file time

Is there any progress on this. It completely ruins our build process, which relies on source files being newer than object files triggers compilation.
by Thomas Linder Puls
Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:58 pm
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Undo check-out does not set current file time
Replies: 10
Views: 14520

Re: Undo check-out does not set current file time

I use version 8.0.1. "Set file time" is set to "Current". In the images you can see how time is "current" on a file I have checked out and edited. The second image shows the state after undo check-out. As you can see the time is set to 01-09.2014 11:07:05, which is far ...
by Thomas Linder Puls
Wed Apr 15, 2015 3:29 am
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Undo check-out does not set current file time
Replies: 10
Views: 14520

Undo check-out does not set current file time

When undoing a check out the file time on the reverted file is not set to current (even though that is the setting I use).

Vault version 8.0.1
by Thomas Linder Puls
Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Diff labels: %LEFT_LABEL% and %RIGHT_LABEL%
Replies: 2
Views: 5131

Diff labels: %LEFT_LABEL% and %RIGHT_LABEL%

I use BeyondCompare (but I guess the problem is the same with other diff programs). The problem is that the labels starts with the insignificant information: Example: Repository Version ($/_Vip6/ProDir/pfc/ppStream/ppStreamSupport/ ppScope_byNeed.pro ). BeyondCompare uses the left label for tab titl...
by Thomas Linder Puls
Thu Jan 29, 2015 4:03 am
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Suggestion: Command line shell/interactive mode
Replies: 4
Views: 6306

Re: Suggestion: Command line shell/interactive mode

Well, today we actually have a COM component based on your CLC, so we know what we need to do. Merging changes and recompiling the program is a rather little part of the process. We also have to create an installation program which must be distributed to my colleagues who will have to install it on ...
by Thomas Linder Puls
Wed Jan 28, 2015 4:21 am
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Suggestion: Command line shell/interactive mode
Replies: 4
Views: 6306

Re: Suggestion: Command line shell/interactive mode

Thank you.

I know that the CLC code is available, and as I wrote above, I am willing to make the update.

The important thing for me is not to have to remake it each time we upgrade.
by Thomas Linder Puls
Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:48 am
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Suggestion: Command line shell/interactive mode
Replies: 4
Views: 6306

Suggestion: Command line shell/interactive mode

It would be very nice if the command line program (vault.exe) supported a "shell"/interactive mode: You start like batch mode (providing host, repository, user and password directly on the command line), but Each command will have its own output (flushed after that command) An error will n...
by Thomas Linder Puls
Fri May 23, 2014 3:47 am
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Edit on Exclusive locked file removes write protection.
Replies: 6
Views: 8220

Re: Edit on Exclusive locked file removes write protection.

Hi, Jeff. In a version control system in "Check Out/Edit/Check In" mode, why should the command "Edit" mean "Edit no matter what"? I believe it is quite natural to assume that it refers to the "Edit" in "Check Out/ Edit /Check In". From the question ...
by Thomas Linder Puls
Fri Oct 04, 2013 1:00 pm
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Client API 7.0 missing entities
Replies: 3
Views: 4434

Re: Client API 7.0 missing entities

Thank you. I guessed part of this myself. Furthermore, the reason that I mention version 4 of the framework was because I got some warnings that some of the mentioned DLL's was target at version 4. However, it turned out that some of the references are not really need and when removed the warnings d...
by Thomas Linder Puls
Thu Oct 03, 2013 6:24 am
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Client API 7.0 missing entities
Replies: 3
Views: 4434

Re: Client API 7.0 missing entities

I also think the target .net framework should be version 4 (rather than 2).
by Thomas Linder Puls
Thu Oct 03, 2013 5:31 am
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Client API 7.0 missing entities
Replies: 3
Views: 4434

Client API 7.0 missing entities

As a spike test to upgrading to version 7, I have tested the Client API, which we use. And found that none of the two included projects VaultClientIntegrationLibCode and CommandLineClientCode can be compiled. Both have references to a number of non-included entities. VaultClientIntegrationLibCode .....
by Thomas Linder Puls
Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:42 am
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Unshelve timestamps
Replies: 14
Views: 18549

Re: Unshelve timestamps

Excellent, we really appreciate this.