Search found 33 matches

by chris.bradley
Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:36 pm
Forum: Support (Vault Professional)
Topic: Cruise Control / Force Build
Replies: 5
Views: 4747

Re: Cruise Control / Force Build

Speed issue appears to be in fortress gui client too, we don't currently use folder security. I'm wondering if maybe I could have a quick phone conversation with someone around there. I wonder if maybe there's some things we can change in our process which might make this run faster... maybe I could...
by chris.bradley
Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:46 am
Forum: Support (Vault Professional)
Topic: Cruise Control / Force Build
Replies: 5
Views: 4747

Re: Cruise Control / Force Build

[03/08/2011 8:45:44 AM] Version Check: This Fortress client is version 2.0.3.18802 [03/08/2011 8:45:44 AM] Version Check: Your Fortress server is version 2.0.3.18802 To add to the mystery... we run multiple branches of our product. A mainline branch and then a bunch of development branches. The main...
by chris.bradley
Tue Mar 08, 2011 10:48 am
Forum: Support (Vault Professional)
Topic: Cruise Control / Force Build
Replies: 5
Views: 4747

Cruise Control / Force Build

We use fortress / vault pro with cruise control and I think I recently came to the conclusion that whenever cruise runs a build it's doing a FULL get instead of just grabbing changes. Now I could be wrong here but I hooked up process monitor to the cruise control exe and when the "Getting Source" co...
by chris.bradley
Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:03 pm
Forum: Support (Fortress)
Topic: Moving Items from one tracking project to another
Replies: 8
Views: 6337

Re: Moving Items from one tracking project to another

I'd like to second this feature. We prep some of our new milestones in a second project, and then we move stuff into the "Current Development" project. The ability to batch move from one Project to another would be awesome.
by chris.bradley
Tue May 26, 2009 10:32 am
Forum: Support (Fortress)
Topic: Cruise Control 1.4.4 and Fortress 1.1.4
Replies: 5
Views: 4396

Re: Cruise Control 1.4.4 and Fortress 1.1.4

Yes, that's what I tried. The problem is because they changed the AssemblyKeyFile the public key token on the DLL has changed. You can't perform an assembly redirect if the public key token changes.
by chris.bradley
Tue May 26, 2009 10:18 am
Forum: Support (Fortress)
Topic: Cruise Control 1.4.4 and Fortress 1.1.4
Replies: 5
Views: 4396

Re: Cruise Control 1.4.4 and Fortress 1.1.4

I think I spoke too soon on this. It looks like the problem is with the latest version of Cruise Control. They changed the signing information on that NetReflector.dll because they lost the key. It looks like they're working to find the old signing info so this doesn't become a major issue. I've gon...
by chris.bradley
Tue May 26, 2009 9:21 am
Forum: Support (Fortress)
Topic: Cruise Control 1.4.4 and Fortress 1.1.4
Replies: 5
Views: 4396

Cruise Control 1.4.4 and Fortress 1.1.4

Hey guys, I tried to upgrade Cruise Control to version 1.4.4 and can't get it working. It looks like Cruise Control 1.4.4 has a reference to an assembly called NetReflector 1.1.2009.1004 but the Fortress Plugin for Cruise Control has a reference to NetReflector 1.0.0.120. I tried messing around with...
by chris.bradley
Thu Apr 02, 2009 8:29 am
Forum: Support (Fortress)
Topic: Slow VaultLabel NAnt Task
Replies: 5
Views: 3896

Re: Slow VaultLabel NAnt Task

Or maybe do I need to specifiy the versionId when I call vaultlabel? Any idea what I would pass if I was trying to get this variable from Cruise Control?
by chris.bradley
Thu Apr 02, 2009 8:26 am
Forum: Support (Fortress)
Topic: Slow VaultLabel NAnt Task
Replies: 5
Views: 3896

Re: Slow VaultLabel NAnt Task

Hey Linda, we're running Fortress Client and Server 1.1.4.18402 I did check the server log but nothing interesting in there, just a login message when the build starts, and then a logout message about 2 minutes later when it finishes. It's really strange - I can't think of anything that would cause ...
by chris.bradley
Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:37 am
Forum: Support (Fortress)
Topic: Slow VaultLabel NAnt Task
Replies: 5
Views: 3896

Re: Slow VaultLabel NAnt Task

Also, the .chm documentation inside the NantTasks for Fortress doesn't seem to work. WHenever you open a topic you get a "Address is not valid" page on the right.

Thanks,
Chris
by chris.bradley
Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:17 am
Forum: Support (Fortress)
Topic: Slow VaultLabel NAnt Task
Replies: 5
Views: 3896

Slow VaultLabel NAnt Task

I've been doing some research into the speed of our continuous integration server (Cruise Control) and found something really strange. When I execute the following nAnt script to apply a label to a folder in vault, it takes almost a minute to execute. Running this same command from the Vault Client ...
by chris.bradley
Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:49 pm
Forum: Support (Fortress)
Topic: Fortress Server "Flaky"
Replies: 1
Views: 1812

Fortress Server "Flaky"

In the last few days of doing some offsite development we've found our Fortress Server had become a little "flaky". I'll admit it could totally just be a bad network connection back to the fortress server, but it seems like it's getting worse. On a whim, I decided to check the fortress server log. C...
by chris.bradley
Tue Nov 04, 2008 12:47 pm
Forum: Support (Fortress)
Topic: Unable to use Obliterate
Replies: 5
Views: 11993

Re: Unable to use Obliterate

Is there any way I can find what those branch "links" are?
by chris.bradley
Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:46 am
Forum: Support (Fortress)
Topic: Unable to use Obliterate
Replies: 5
Views: 11993

Unable to use Obliterate

Whenever I try to use the obliterate function I'm getting the following error message. An error occurred processing the request: Unable to Obliterate item: $/_CBTest All branches of an item must be obliterated before the item itself can be obliterated. It is possible that some of the branched items ...
by chris.bradley
Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:03 pm
Forum: Support (Vault)
Topic: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Replies: 6
Views: 2164

Re: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

Thanks Ian - we'll give it a whirl.