Search found 10 matches
- Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:39 pm
- Forum: Support (Fortress)
- Topic: CCNET Source Get Fail
- Replies: 17
- Views: 27919
Re: CCNET Source Get Fail
Thnaks Linda. Email sent.
- Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:37 pm
- Forum: Support (Fortress)
- Topic: CCNET Source Get Fail
- Replies: 17
- Views: 27919
Re: CCNET Source Get Fail
For anyone in a similar position who has to rollback their ccnet installation. The rollback to version 1.4.4.83 of ccnet was incredibly simple: Stop ccnet service, stop IIS, copy backup over the Program Files (x86)\CruiseControl.NET folder, start ccnet service, start IIS and in my case, set the appr...
- Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:22 pm
- Forum: Support (Fortress)
- Topic: CCNET Source Get Fail
- Replies: 17
- Views: 27919
Re: CCNET Source Get Fail
This 'might' help when trying to track down the issue, or it might just add more confusion but I also get this exception: System.MissingFieldException: Field not found: 'ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Modification.ChangeNumber'. at ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Core.Sourcecontrol.FortressVaultSourceCo...
- Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:02 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: Linking Vault as Source Server to re-indexed .PDB files
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9122
Re: Linking Vault as Source Server to re-indexed .PDB files
Tim, Any chance of you sharing your Perl Script either here, or at least back to the guys at Source Gear so that they might be able to provide something similar in the future. (I assume you are the same Tim that was asking similar questions on StackOverflow - sorry to be hassling you from multiple a...
- Sun Nov 16, 2008 5:44 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: Merging Vault Databases/Data
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5171
Re: Merging Vault Databases/Data
ahhh, its simple when you know how.
Thanks for the response Linda.
Thanks for the response Linda.
- Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:05 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: Merging Vault Databases/Data
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5171
Merging Vault Databases/Data
Our Company is currently looking at taking on a new developer and taking on one of his major applications. He has been using a Fortress Single User licence for Source Code Control and as far as I’m aware he hasn’t been using any of the other features of Fortress. We have a Vault Server with a 8 full...
- Wed May 02, 2007 9:27 pm
- Forum: Gold Support (Vault) -- Read-only
- Topic: Issue upgrading from 3.1.9.3798 to 3.5.0
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7590
- Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:15 am
- Forum: Gold Support (Vault) -- Read-only
- Topic: Issue upgrading from 3.1.9.3798 to 3.5.0
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7590
- Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:59 am
- Forum: Gold Support (Vault) -- Read-only
- Topic: Issue upgrading from 3.1.9.3798 to 3.5.0
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7590
Issue upgrading from 3.1.9.3798 to 3.5.0
Hi guys, I’m having issues upgrading the Vault Database to version 3.5.0. To begin with I had version 3.1.8 of the database and I attempted to run the 3.5.0 setup, but received this error message: Upgrading SourceGear Vault database schema...ALTER TABLE statement conflicted with TABLE FOREIGN KEY co...
- Tue Jan 20, 2004 7:38 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: Problems logging in to Vault
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9022
I managed to sort this problem out (I was the one having the issue at my client end). After reading the Vault knowledge base article about client side cache files http://support.sourcegear.com/viewtopic.php?t=6 I decided to nuke my cache files and see if it had any effect. It fixed the problem in th...