That fixes it - renaming _sgvault.
But how did it get that way?
Search found 176 matches
- Tue May 29, 2012 10:35 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: File keeps renegade status even if use get latest overwrite
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6959
- Tue May 29, 2012 6:01 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: File keeps renegade status even if use get latest overwrite
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6959
File keeps renegade status even if use get latest overwrite
Attached is a VaultGUIClient.txt log file (Ctrl-Alt-Shift-F12) Any ideas why this occurs? The file should just be overwritten. Only happens on the one PC We also tried really making it renegade - modified the local file - and when did get latest overwrite the file was overwritten but the status stil...
- Mon May 28, 2012 6:54 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: Anyone have experience with using a RAM disk with Vault?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 15644
Anyone have experience with using a RAM disk with Vault?
Hi, I was wondering if anyone has had experience with using a RAM disk to improve the performance of Vault Client when it first opens up after a re-boot or when the PC has been left overnight? I have used Primo RAM Disk and have seen only a very slight improvement - 10% faster maybe. Anybody seen a ...
- Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:39 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: Does Vault 5.0.3 support Visual Studio 2010?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3161
Re: Does Vault 5.0.3 support Visual Studio 2010?
Well its currently working as far as we can tell. It may be a free charge to upgrade as far as SourceGear is concerned, but it costs us time in testing the new version and we are in a major release cycle right now. Not a good time to do an upgrade. Also you are working on a new version that actually...
- Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:27 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: Does Vault 5.0.3 support Visual Studio 2010?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3161
Does Vault 5.0.3 support Visual Studio 2010?
Does Vault 5.0.3 support Visual Studio 2010?
- Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:47 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault Professional)
- Topic: Is the Admin user required?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3419
Is the Admin user required?
Hi,
We need another user in Vault and would like to remove the Admin user.
We have 2 other users with full admin rights. (In the Admin Group)
Is there any reason we need to keep "Admin" user? Are there any special rights it has purely because its named "Admin"?
We need another user in Vault and would like to remove the Admin user.
We have 2 other users with full admin rights. (In the Admin Group)
Is there any reason we need to keep "Admin" user? Are there any special rights it has purely because its named "Admin"?
- Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:46 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: Visual Studio 2010 integration
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1905
Visual Studio 2010 integration
We have Vault 5.0.3 installed. The Enhanced Client is not available in the VS 2010 source control drop down. Is a later version required?
- Thu May 19, 2011 7:25 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: BeginLabelQuery returned: FailInvalidSessionToken
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2718
Re: BeginLabelQuery returned: FailInvalidSessionToken
The history operation did not take a long time. It was the following Show Label that had the issue.
- Thu May 19, 2011 7:22 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: BeginSaveShelveSet returned: Critical Error!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4698
Re: BeginSaveShelveSet returned: Critical Error!
The issue is that it is thrown at all! Its a normal part of the processing to deal with a shelveset that already exists. Its not an error condition. The user gets informed and makes a choice.
- Wed May 18, 2011 5:43 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: BeginLabelQuery returned: FailInvalidSessionToken
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2718
BeginLabelQuery returned: FailInvalidSessionToken
This was recorded in the server log yesterday: ----18/05/2011 2:34:45 PM phil--LANSABUILDPC4(10.2.1.53)--SSL Disabled BeginLabelQuery returned: FailInvalidSessionToken ----18/05/2011 2:34:52 PM phil--LANSABUILDPC4(10.2.1.53)--SSL Disabled Logout ----18/05/2011 2:34:59 PM phil--LANSABUILDPC4(10.2.1.5...
- Wed May 18, 2011 4:46 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: BeginSaveShelveSet returned: Critical Error!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4698
Re: BeginSaveShelveSet returned: Critical Error!
The shelveset does exist already! Strange thing to report as an error. Its like the stack trace in the client log when a user enters the wrong password. The message that the password failed is good. The stack trace is bad. A waste of time for administrators. I'd ask for an enhancement that both thes...
- Tue May 17, 2011 3:56 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: BeginSaveShelveSet returned: Critical Error!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4698
BeginSaveShelveSet returned: Critical Error!
I found this error in the server log file. There were no errors shown in Vault Client: ----17/05/2011 6:16:22 PM robert--ROBPC(10.2.1.32)--SSL Disabled BeginSaveShelveSet returned: Critical Error! ----17/05/2011 6:16:22 PM robert--ROBPC(10.2.1.32)--SSL Disabled BeginSaveShelveSet returned: 1233 Shel...
- Mon May 16, 2011 4:17 pm
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: Equivalent to Vault Tools/Options in API?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 20703
Re: Equivalent to Vault Tools/Options in API?
Hi Beth, I have executed rapid check ins to exercise the Plug In and it coped with 27 check ins in 11 seconds. Note that this was not using the Vault Client. With the 8 second delay it can't get within cooee of this rate of transactions. So the Plugin is now I achieved this by synchronising access t...
- Sun May 15, 2011 11:46 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: Slow response when first initiating a server request IPV6
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1996
Slow response when first initiating a server request IPV6
Hi, We've resolved this issue already. This is just to be of help for anyone else who might come across the issue. We noticed that operations like check out, or diffs or History would take up to 30 seconds the first time we tried it and then be almost instantaneous the 2nd and subsequent. If we left...
- Sun May 15, 2011 5:47 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: Removing 90% of Repository: performance issues
- Replies: 17
- Views: 19505
Re: Removing 90% of Repository: performance issues
I'll reply by email with the log information. This is just to clarify this post thread:
The two machines are responding identically.
We had Folder Security on. I switched it off and it made no difference to the Check In time.
We do not use Shadow Folders.
The two machines are responding identically.
We had Folder Security on. I switched it off and it made no difference to the Check In time.
We do not use Shadow Folders.