SourceGear Support

@Beth:Yes I would go for manual failover. The main purpose of mirroring is to have an online backup. Ready to be used in case disaster strikes. In case SQL Server A fails I would do a manual failover to SQL Server B. Vault databases at SQL Server B would be active (primary). I can easily reinstall V...

Yes is certainly apply to me. I have just upgraded to Version 6.0.0.477 Installed 07 september 2012. I have prepared the update for some days (using a copy of the live database)
Sigh, I will have to schedule another update
Thanks for pointing out the availability of version 6.0.1.

Has there been any development in this issue? I do believe support of mirroring (not replication) is crucial in a production environment. To my knowledge there is no way an application accessing a database can detect or observe whether the database is mirrored or not. My main objective is just to ha...

I do see the same issue after upgrading from Vault 5 til Vault 6 (Standard) sgvault log: ----07-09-2012 18:48:12 admin--hwa-1269.pdc.xx(10.117.33.1)--SSL Disabled Uncaught Exception: Exception of type 'System.Web.HttpUnhandledException' was thrown. Inner Exception: Index was outside the bounds of th...

Does Vault Standard supports mirroring of Vault Database and automatic fail over. SQL Server 2008 supports real time mirroring of databases as outlined in http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188712.aspx. I am interested in setting up High safety with automatic failover (synchronous) In the ...