SourceGear Support

Then, at last, I understand...

It only fails from the history window.

It's not commited if done from the file list, you have it in the pending change set
It's automatically commited (whatever option you have selected) if you select a file, show history, then pin any version.

Hello I would like to know the way you thought branches should be idealy done in Vault. There are many solutions (pin a project, branch everything, pin every file, ....) and I'm always unsure what would be best. Is there some sample, documentation on the way you expect user to do it. It might depend...

In one sentence: I would like to have the pin/unpin command be present in the commit list. Otherwise... Let's take an example (a real one as you can guess). I work on project A that is to be released in a while and make important changes on a shared class (.cpp & .h) Someone works on project B t...

Yes, I would like to pin several files at the same time. I'm rather disappointed that pin/unpin are not in history. According to me this is mandatory.... You cannot have an history that is correct if you do not store this information. However this explains why it do not require a commit. It doesn't ...

Hello

unless I'm wrong Pin/unpin do not require commit. Is there something wrong in my setup or is it by design ?
A fix would be great, as generally we pin .h & .cpp at the same time, so committing both changes at the same time makes sense.

Thanks

Xavier

Hello we use vault to archive our Linux website server. However file case is important, we then needed to make a fix by changing the case of a file that was wrong. The problem is that Vault refuses the change as the destination file exists (same name, but different case). We had to make 2 renames, b...

And please add to never display web only users. Unless I missed something there is absolutely no case where those users should have a file chcked out, a shelve or whatever ? If it's possible to create a shelve from the WEB, then please add the feature to hide web only users and users that don't have...

In the search pane of the vault gui client all the users are listed, in the shelve list also, ... Even the WEB users only are listed in the VAULT GUI Client lists. It would be great to, at least filter the developpers only and possibly remove the inactive users. As for renaming users, the problem is...

Hello, we create user for customer's, developers, people needing temporary access to the repositories and look at bugs. The problem is we now have really a lot of users and they cannot be removed (unless I missed something). It could be OK, if inactive users were hidden from the lists (almost all of...

You can add my vote as well

Now the server fails to start with: ----07/10/2009 10:02:39 --SSL Enabled System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Cannot open database "sgvault" requested by the login. The login failed. Login failed for user 'AUTORITE NT\SERVICE RÉSEAU'. That seems logical as I changed the service under whic...

dbcc CheckDB ('sgvault') => Msg 5030, Level 16, State 12, Line 1 The database could not be exclusively locked to perform the operation. Msg 7926, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Check statement aborted. The database could not be checked as a database snapshot could not be created and the database or table...

I know I shouldn't have (as I have called you), but I tried to restart SQLServer and it worked after some minutes (after the cache was built I guess)

Is it possible to do sanity checks to know if we've lost some data ?

Thanks

Hello here is a snippet of the log file ----02/10/2009 16:22:01 sgvaultsystem--()-- System Started Version 2.0.1.18729 Cache Level = 1 DataBase Buffer Size (KB) = 256 LogFile Path = C:\Windows\Temp\sgvault Log Level = Quiet Archive Log = Weekly ReverseDNS Lookup = True Maximum HTTP Request Length = ...

Hello

I've cleaned and reorder the source tree to ease security. Now I would like to start from a clean security setup ?
Do you have some SQL command (or create if not too difficult...) that would do that (reset the security of all folder to defaul) ?

Thanks

XAvier