SourceGear Support

Hello,

I cannot find the 'Line History' feature anymore in VS 2010.
I use the enhanced client.

It would be great to be able to edit items, even if it requires running OnTime executable or link to its web browser. As I do not see my other post: - it would be great to have features, tasks and incidents as well - have items appear in the SCM file tab of OnTime (not only in the description with a...

I certainly would like to have others items (features, tasks, incidents<=>often not far from bugs) availables

What is strange is that I only see a "Vault Transaction" in the description tab, but nothing in the SCM tab. Is it the expected behaviour ?

I've seen OnTime work with Vault, though not quite clear for me.

I've not seen OnTime work within Vault, and that's my question: how can this be setup.

Xavier

I can have OnTime connect to Vault
but I cannot have Vault connect to OnTime; how can I set this up ?
Do you have a screenshot of your settings ?

Is the OnTime Web server mandatory for that ?

Hello, you're lucky to have it work :-) It's OK from OnTime. But how is the reverse possible. I've found the Axosoft OnTime inIntegration components. But this is not what I expected. I connect directly through SQL; I suppose you use the SDK I do not know at all. Is there any help on that. Why an OnT...

Okay. I've written Visual Studio plug-in that is notified everytime a build is done and if it is successful modifies the resource file version. This file is rarely checked-out, so I need to check it out if it's not the case. I did it with VSS automation, but VS2005 has a great interface that it seem...

I sue Visual Studio 2005 automation in an add in.
This is the latest version of fortress.
I use the enhanced client

Hello control->IsItemUnderSCC (CComBSTR (_T ("$")), &bSC) control->IsItemUnderSCC (CComBSTR (_T ("d:\\sce\\test.cpp")), &bSC) .... always return false based on this post: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vsx/thread/1537cf52-c999-4472-b309-94f71ca15eb5 I suppo...

Hello

would it be possible to have this feature set at the server level ?
I don't think it should be a user option, but rather a company work method.

Xavier

Hello, I apologize for the confusion. Just forget the proxy. I want to prevent some users to access vault remotely (internet) (very old query that doesn't seem to have any chance to be in the product some day). As I'm far to be an IT expert, I gave until I found that our internet router can map port...

no no just an idea.
How should it be done ?

Hello as a simple way to prevent some users to remotely access the database, I would like to redirect the port with our router. eg: we use https locally on port 443 we would remap port XXX to port 443 when access through the router How could we setup a GUI client to use port XXX, with the proxy ? Ho...

I would suggest that you log those as a bugs - Pin/Unpin from the history window also bypass the 'comment required for check-in' option if set in the server, is a bug, though not critical - Pin not sent to pending list is bug, that is according a major failure, though not critical I honestly don't r...

BTW, Pin/Unpin from the history window also bypass the 'comment required for check-in' option if set in the server