Search found 38 matches
- Wed Aug 05, 2009 11:50 am
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: 5.0 demo server
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2106
Re: 5.0 demo server
Using it now - thanks, Linda!
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:22 pm
- Forum: Support (Vault)
- Topic: 5.0 demo server
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2106
5.0 demo server
Is there one?
Thanks,
Eric
Thanks,
Eric
- Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:19 pm
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: ServerOperations.Login() slow
- Replies: 5
- Views: 26922
ServerOperations.Login() slow
We have several customers where our call to ServerOperations.Login() more than a minute to complete. Is there any way to improve on this?
Eric
Eric
- Fri May 08, 2009 9:57 am
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: No GetWorkingFolderAssignments results
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4536
No GetWorkingFolderAssignments results
A customer is running our client and we're not getting any results back from GetWorkingFolderAssignments. I've attached a Vault client api log that has some errors in it. Any idea what's going on? She also says, "The files you had me generate look like they are confirming my suspicion. I have a...
- Fri May 08, 2009 9:29 am
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: Multiple client instances
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6229
Re: Multiple client instances
Jeremy, Thanks, I was able to get this to work. This is what I had to do: final ClientInstance ci = new ClientInstance(); ci.Init(VaultConnection.AccessLevelType.Client); ServerOperations.client.set_ClientInstance(ci); VaultLib.Brander.getInstance().setMode(connection.isFortressMode() ? Brander.Mode...
- Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:59 am
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: Multiple client instances
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6229
Multiple client instances
We can create multiple client instances, running ServerOperations.Login() after setting the client LoginOptions for each one. When we do, running ServerOperations.GetWorkingFolderAssignments() only returns folders corresponding to the first login session. I guess our second call to ServerOperations....
- Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:56 pm
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: Exception connecting to server
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7131
Re: Exception connecting to server
Oops. Got a "The extension log is not allowed" error attaching that file. Here it is. I'll check with the user about vault.exe
- Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:11 pm
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: Exception connecting to server
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7131
Exception connecting to server
Can you take a look at this error? We're using the 4.1.4 Java client API release, and a customer is having problems using our integration to connect to his server. The client never appears to finish connecting, and gets these exceptions: 2/25/2009 1:25:52 PM <crypto>: Failed encryption. [System.Argu...
- Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:58 am
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: Vault/Fortress API compatiblity
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5422
Vault/Fortress API compatiblity
The Vault and Fortress client API's do not appear to be compatible. Trying to connect to Fortress with the 4.1.4 Vault client API gives a 'The server uses a protocol that is not supported by this client' error. If this is the case, is there any chance of getting a client API that works for both?
- Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:08 pm
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: ProcessCommandListChangeSet returns no files modified
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11933
Re: ProcessCommandListChangeSet returns no files modified
Same thing with 4.1.4.18419 - "vault.cmd listchangeset" shows all files modified. The Pending Change Set in the 4.1.2.18185 Vault Client shows just 3 files
Eric
Eric
- Mon Dec 01, 2008 11:37 am
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: ProcessCommandListChangeSet returns no files modified
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11933
Re: ProcessCommandListChangeSet returns no files modified
Your latest Java CLC client (vaultJavaCLC_4_1_3_18336) reproduces this issue. With a 4.1.2 client installed, with files checked out from vaultdemo.sourcegear.com "Repository A", and with CVS-style checkouts selected, and "Detect modified files with CRCs" unselected, running the v...
- Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:53 am
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: ProcessCommandListChangeSet returns no files modified
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11933
Re: ProcessCommandListChangeSet returns no files modified
Do you think (or know) that 4.1.4 has fixed this issue, or something related to it? This behavior has been around for almost a year (since the 4.0.5 client). Does the logging tell you anything?
Will the 4.1.4 client API work with the customer's 4.1.2 client?
Will the 4.1.4 client API work with the customer's 4.1.2 client?
- Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:39 am
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: ProcessCommandListChangeSet returns no files modified
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11933
ProcessCommandListChangeSet returns no files modified
This issue is still occurring with the latest 4.1.2 client API we're using (from viewtopic.php?f=32&t=10824), i.e., ProcessCommandListChangeset returns no files modified when there are modified files. At other times, it returns all files modified. This occurs on a customer's system who was the 4...
- Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:15 pm
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: ProcessCommandListChangeSet returns all files modified
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10517
Re: ProcessCommandListChangeSet returns all files modified
This issue is still occurring with the latest 4.1.2 client API we're using (from http://support.sourcegear.com/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=10824), i.e., ProcessCommandListChangeset returns all files modified (and in some cases returns no files modified), even when there are modified files. This occurs ...
- Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:32 pm
- Forum: Questions (API)
- Topic: Using ProcessCommandListChangeSet too slow
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9211
Re: Using ProcessCommandListChangeSet too slow
Jeremy,
We do log in based on parameters given us by the user. I can get Rolland an updated version of our client, with debugging enabled if that will help - let me know how to do that.
Eric
We do log in based on parameters given us by the user. I can get Rolland an updated version of our client, with debugging enabled if that will help - let me know how to do that.
Eric